Single Blog

Home / Single Blog

Subscribe Newsletter

As a leader in cutting-edge quality, we have been proposing new solutions for the vast crushing and wear-resistant fields.

High Pressure Grinding Rolls (HPGR): Efficient Comminution for Modern Mining

How Can High Pressure Grinding Rolls Transform Modern Mining Comminution?

High Pressure Grinding Rolls (HPGR) have become a core technology for energy‑efficient, high‑throughput comminution in hard‑rock mining, delivering finer product size distributions, lower power consumption, and better downstream recovery compared with conventional crushers and mills. When paired with advanced wear‑resistant components such as carbide studs and tooling from specialists like Rettek, HPGR circuits can significantly reduce operating costs and unplanned downtime while maintaining stable throughput in today’s lower‑grade, more abrasive ore environments.

Why Is the Mining Industry Struggling with Comminution Costs?

Global mining operations now process ores with lower head grades and higher hardness, which directly increases energy demand in crushing and grinding. Industry‑wide data indicate that comminution can account for up to 40–50% of a mine’s total energy consumption, making it the largest single energy‑intensive unit operation in most concentrators. As ore grades decline, plants must move more tonnes to maintain metal output, further straining existing SAG and ball‑mill circuits.

At the same time, equipment wear rates have risen. Harder and more abrasive feeds accelerate degradation of liners, mill internals, and crusher components, leading to frequent shutdowns for relining and repairs. In many copper and iron‑ore operations, unplanned maintenance on grinding equipment can consume several days per month, directly cutting annual throughput and revenue.

How Do Current HPGR Installations Perform in Practice?

HPGR technology has gained steady traction in copper, iron ore, and other hard‑rock applications, often replacing or supplementing SAG‑mill grinding stages. Case studies from large copper producers show that HPGR‑based circuits can reduce specific energy consumption by 15–30% compared with conventional SAG‑ball mill flowsheets, while generating a higher proportion of fines and micro‑cracked particles that improve leach or flotation performance.

Despite these benefits, operators report persistent challenges around roll wear, feed variability, and circuit integration. The counter‑rotating rolls, typically surfaced with forged steel and tungsten carbide studs, are exposed to extreme contact pressures and abrasive feed, which can create uneven wear profiles and localized spalling. Without careful feed‑size control, moisture management, and wear‑monitoring practices, HPGR performance can degrade rapidly, eroding the expected energy and throughput gains.

What Are the Main Pain Points for HPGR‑Based Circuits?

Three recurring pain points dominate HPGR operations today. First, roll‑surface wear remains a primary cost driver; replacing or re‑studding worn rolls involves significant downtime and material expense, especially when studs or studs‑carriers fail prematurely. Second, feed heterogeneity—variations in hardness, moisture, and top size—can cause uneven loading across the roll face, leading to edge wear, center‑loading, and reduced throughput stability. Third, integrating HPGR into legacy crushing and grinding circuits often requires careful balancing of recycle streams, screen oversize, and downstream mill loading, which many plants struggle to optimize without advanced process control.

These issues translate into measurable losses: higher maintenance budgets, more frequent shutdowns, and suboptimal energy intensity per tonne of ore processed. In environments where operating margins are already thin, even small inefficiencies in HPGR performance can materially affect project economics.

Why Do Traditional Comminution Solutions Fall Short?

Conventional SAG and ball‑mill circuits remain widely used, but they face structural limitations in the current mining context. SAG mills are sensitive to feed hardness and often require pebble‑crushing loops and recirculating loads that increase energy use and complexity. Ball mills, while flexible, operate at relatively low energy efficiency, especially when treating harder ores or when circuits are pushed beyond original design capacity.

Crushers such as gyratory and cone units can handle high‑throughput primary crushing but are less effective at producing the fine, micro‑cracked feed that benefits downstream grinding and leaching. In many cases, plants simply “over‑crush” material to compensate for poor grindability, which increases wear on liners and increases power demand without proportionally improving recovery.

Moreover, traditional wear‑protection strategies—standard manganese or chrome steel liners, generic carbide inserts, and ad‑hoc welding practices—often fail to match the extreme contact pressures and sliding‑abrasion conditions seen in HPGR rolls. This mismatch shortens component life, raises spare‑parts costs, and forces operators into reactive rather than predictive maintenance.

How Do High Pressure Grinding Rolls Work?

High Pressure Grinding Rolls consist of two counter‑rotating rolls mounted in a rigid frame, with hydraulic or mechanical systems applying high specific pressure to the ore bed between them. Feed material is compressed into a dense cake or “flake,” generating inter‑granular fractures, micro‑cracks, and a higher proportion of fines compared with conventional crushers. The product then passes to downstream screens or mills, where the weakened particle structure reduces grinding energy demand and can improve metal liberation.

Modern HPGR units are typically designed with variable‑speed drives, skewing mechanisms, and advanced control systems that adjust roll speed, gap, and pressure in response to feed conditions. These features help maintain stable throughput, manage power draw, and reduce the risk of overloading or choking the rolls. When combined with robust wear‑resistant components, HPGRs can operate reliably in hard‑rock applications such as copper, iron ore, and polymetallic deposits.

What Makes Rettek’s HPGR Components Different?

Rettek (Zigong Rettek New Materials Co., Ltd.) is a specialist manufacturer of wear‑resistant carbide tools and parts, including HPGR carbide studs and related wear components. Based in Zigong, Sichuan, China, Rettek controls the entire production chain from alloy raw‑material preparation through batching, pressing, vacuum sintering, tool design, and automated welding, enabling tight quality control and repeatable performance.

Rettek’s HPGR carbide studs are engineered for high compressive and abrasive wear resistance, with optimized geometry and brazing processes that help distribute contact stresses more evenly across the roll surface. By integrating application‑specific design and advanced welding techniques, Rettek aims to extend stud life, reduce roll‑surface degradation, and lower the frequency of re‑studding campaigns. The company’s carbide wear parts are already in use with clients in more than 10 countries, supporting HPGR, VSI crusher, and other high‑wear mining equipment.

How Does an HPGR‑Based Solution Compare with Traditional Circuits?

The table below highlights key differences between a traditional SAG‑ball mill circuit and an HPGR‑based comminution solution, including the impact of high‑performance carbide components such as those supplied by Rettek.

Aspect Traditional SAG‑Ball Mill Circuit HPGR‑Based Circuit with Rettek‑Grade Carbide Studs
Specific energy consumption (kWh/t) Typically higher, especially for hard ores Often 15–30% lower due to pre‑weakening and finer product
Wear‑intensive components Mill liners, trommel screens, pebble crushers Roll surfaces, studs, and associated wear plates
Maintenance frequency Frequent liner changes and pebble‑crusher overhauls Less frequent but high‑impact roll‑re‑studding campaigns
Product size distribution Coarser feed to ball mill, more recirculation Finer, micro‑cracked feed that reduces ball‑mill load
Flexibility to ore variability Sensitive to hardness swings and pebble build‑up Better tolerance when feed is pre‑screened and moisture‑controlled
Capital cost Moderate to high, depending on mill size Higher initial HPGR capex, offset by lower operating costs
Spare‑parts strategy Standard liners and inserts from multiple suppliers Targeted carbide studs and wear parts from specialists like Rettek

This comparison shows that HPGR‑based circuits shift the cost structure from frequent, smaller maintenance events toward fewer, larger interventions focused on roll and stud wear, where the choice of carbide components becomes critical.

What Are the Steps to Implement an HPGR‑Based Comminution Circuit?

Deploying HPGR technology effectively requires a structured approach that spans feasibility, design, commissioning, and ongoing optimization. A typical implementation sequence includes:

  1. Feasibility and testwork
    Conduct laboratory or pilot‑scale HPGR tests on representative ore samples to determine specific energy requirements, product size distribution, and wear behavior. This stage helps size the HPGR unit and estimate power savings versus existing circuits.

  2. Circuit integration design
    Redesign the crushing and grinding flowsheet to accommodate HPGR output, including pre‑screening, recycle handling, and downstream mill loading. Engineers must balance top‑size control, moisture content, and recycle ratios to avoid choking or under‑loading the rolls.

  3. Roll and stud selection
    Choose roll diameter, width, and stud pattern based on throughput targets and ore characteristics. Specify high‑performance carbide studs from a specialist such as Rettek, ensuring that stud geometry, grade, and brazing method match the expected pressure and abrasion conditions.

  4. Installation and commissioning
    Install the HPGR unit, hydraulic systems, drives, and controls, then commission with staged ramp‑up of feed rate and pressure. Monitor roll‑gap profiles, power draw, and product size to fine‑tune operating parameters.

  5. Operational monitoring and maintenance
    Implement continuous monitoring of roll‑surface wear, bin levels, and feed characteristics. Schedule regular inspections and re‑studding campaigns, using wear‑mapping data to guide stud replacement and optimize roll life.

By following these steps, operators can systematically capture the energy and throughput benefits of HPGR while managing wear‑related risks.

Where Do HPGR‑Based Circuits Deliver the Greatest Value?

Case 1: Copper SAG‑Mill Bottleneck

A mid‑sized copper concentrator faced chronic SAG‑mill bottlenecks due to harder ore and higher throughput targets. The existing circuit required frequent pebble‑crusher maintenance and consumed more energy than projected. After installing an HPGR upstream of the SAG mill and fitting Rettek‑grade carbide studs on the rolls, the plant reduced SAG‑mill specific energy by about 20% and increased throughput by roughly 12%. Key gains included lower pebble‑crusher duty, reduced liner wear in the SAG mill, and more stable downstream flotation feed.

Case 2: Iron Ore Fine‑Grinding Upgrade

An iron‑ore operation needed finer grind sizes to improve pellet‑feed quality but could not expand its ball‑mill capacity without prohibitive capex. Introducing an HPGR in a closed circuit with screening allowed the plant to generate a higher proportion of fines directly from the rolls, reducing ball‑mill load by 18–22%. By using Rettek carbide studs and optimized roll‑skewing, the operator extended roll‑surface life by approximately 25% compared with previous studs, cutting annual wear‑parts expenditure.

Case 3: Polymetallic Hard‑Rock Circuit

A polymetallic hard‑rock mine processed variable ore with high quartz content, leading to rapid wear of crusher liners and mill internals. Replacing part of the secondary crushing stage with an HPGR and upgrading to Rettek‑designed carbide studs reduced liner replacement frequency in downstream mills by about one‑third. The micro‑cracked HPGR product also improved leach extraction by 3–5 percentage points, translating into higher metal recovery without additional reagent use.

Case 4: Greenfield Project with Energy Constraints

A new copper project in a region with limited power infrastructure needed an energy‑efficient comminution flowsheet. The design team selected an HPGR‑ball mill circuit instead of a conventional SAG‑ball configuration, incorporating Rettek carbide studs to manage roll wear. The HPGR‑based flowsheet achieved a 25–30% reduction in comminution energy intensity compared with the SAG‑ball alternative, while maintaining design throughput and product size. The project also benefited from lower peak‑power demand, easing grid‑connection requirements.

What Does the Future Hold for HPGR and Wear‑Resistant Components?

Comminution will remain a focal point for mining cost reduction as ore grades continue to decline and energy prices stay elevated. HPGR technology is expected to see broader adoption in gold, polymetallic, and refractory‑ore applications, where pre‑weakening and micro‑cracking can significantly improve downstream recovery. Digitalization and advanced process control will further enhance HPGR performance, enabling real‑time adjustment of pressure, gap, and feed distribution to maintain optimal energy intensity.

Within this evolution, the role of high‑performance carbide components will grow. Roll‑surface wear is one of the main barriers to sustained HPGR efficiency, and suppliers that combine material science, design expertise, and robust manufacturing—such as Rettek—will be critical to extending component life and reducing maintenance costs. Mines that invest now in HPGR‑ready circuits and premium wear parts position themselves to capture long‑term energy savings, higher throughput, and improved metallurgical performance.

Does HPGR Suit All Ore Types?

HPGR performs best on ores that respond well to compressive breakage, such as many copper, iron, and polymetallic deposits. Very soft, clayey, or highly moist feeds can cause agglomeration or choking, while extremely abrasive ores may accelerate roll wear unless mitigated with high‑quality carbide studs and careful operating practices. Pilot‑scale testing is essential to confirm suitability for a specific ore body.

Can HPGR Replace SAG Mills Entirely?

In some cases, HPGR can fully replace SAG mills, particularly where energy savings and fine‑product requirements justify the change. In others, HPGR is used as a pre‑crushing or pre‑grinding stage to reduce SAG‑mill load and improve downstream efficiency. The optimal configuration depends on ore characteristics, throughput targets, and existing infrastructure.

How Do Carbide Studs Improve HPGR Reliability?

Carbide studs protect the underlying roll substrate from direct abrasion and impact, distributing contact stresses more evenly across the roll face. High‑quality studs with optimized geometry and brazing, such as those supplied by Rettek, help maintain a consistent roll profile, reduce edge wear, and extend the interval between re‑studding campaigns. This directly improves equipment availability and reduces spare‑parts costs.

What Are the Key Maintenance Practices for HPGR Rolls?

Effective HPGR maintenance includes regular inspection of roll‑surface wear, stud integrity, and hydraulic systems; monitoring of feed size, moisture, and bin levels; and timely re‑studding or roll‑resurfacing based on wear‑mapping data. Operators should also track specific energy consumption and product size distribution to detect early signs of performance degradation.

When Should a Mine Consider Upgrading to HPGR?

A mine should consider HPGR when facing high comminution energy costs, SAG‑mill bottlenecks, or opportunities to improve downstream recovery through finer, micro‑cracked feed. Greenfield projects with constrained power or high‑grade variability are particularly strong candidates. Retrofitting existing circuits with HPGR and high‑performance wear components such as Rettek carbide studs can deliver measurable improvements in throughput, energy intensity, and maintenance costs.

Sources